
The Council today decided to prolong the framework for restrictive measures against cyber-attacks threatening the EU or its member states for another year, until 18 May 2022.
This framework allows the EU to impose targeted restrictive measures on persons or entities involved in cyber-attacks which cause a significant impact, and constitute an external threat to the EU or its member states. Restrictive measures can also be imposed in response to cyber-attacks against third states or international organisations where such measures are considered necessary to achieve the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP).
Sanctions currently apply to eight individuals and four entities, and include an asset freeze and a travel ban. Additionally, EU persons and entities are forbidden from making funds available to those listed.
Background
This latest prolongation is part of the EU’s scale up of its resilience and its ability to prevent, discourage, deter and respond to cyber threats and malicious cyber activities in order to safeguard European security and interests.
In June 2017, the EU stepped up its response by establishing a Framework for a Joint EU Diplomatic Response to Malicious Cyber Activities (the „cyber diplomacy toolbox“). The framework allows the EU and its Member States to use all CFSP measures, including restrictive measures if necessary, to prevent, discourage, deter and respond to malicious cyber activities targeting the integrity and security of the EU and its member states.
The EU remains committed to a global, open, stable, peaceful and secure cyberspace and therefore reiterates the need to strengthen international cooperation in order to promote the rules-based order in this area.
- Malicious cyber-attacks: EU sanctions two individuals and one body over 2015 Bundestag hack, press release 22 October 2020
- Council extends cyber sanctions regime until 18 May 2021, press release 14 May 2020
- Council decision concerning restrictive measures against cyber-attacks threatening the Union or its Member States, consolidated text
Fachartikel

Wenn Angreifer selbst zum Ziel werden: Wie Forscher eine Infostealer-Infrastruktur kompromittierten

Mehr Gesetze, mehr Druck: Was bei NIS2, CRA, DORA & Co. am Ende zählt

WinDbg-UI blockiert beim Kopieren: Ursachenforschung führt zu Zwischenablage-Deadlock in virtuellen Umgebungen

RISE with SAP: Wie Sicherheitsmaßnahmen den Return on Investment sichern

Jailbreaking: Die unterschätzte Sicherheitslücke moderner KI-Systeme
Studien

Deutsche Unicorn-Gründer bevorzugen zunehmend den Standort Deutschland

IT-Modernisierung entscheidet über KI-Erfolg und Cybersicherheit

Neue ISACA-Studie: Datenschutzbudgets werden trotz steigender Risiken voraussichtlich schrumpfen

Cybersecurity-Jahresrückblick: Wie KI-Agenten und OAuth-Lücken die Bedrohungslandschaft 2025 veränderten
![Featured image for “Phishing-Studie deckt auf: [EXTERN]-Markierung schützt Klinikpersonal kaum”](https://www.all-about-security.de/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/phishing-4.jpg)
Phishing-Studie deckt auf: [EXTERN]-Markierung schützt Klinikpersonal kaum
Whitepaper

ETSI veröffentlicht weltweit führenden Standard für die Sicherung von KI

Allianz Risk Barometer 2026: Cyberrisiken führen das Ranking an, KI rückt auf Platz zwei vor

Cybersecurity-Jahresrückblick: Wie KI-Agenten und OAuth-Lücken die Bedrohungslandschaft 2025 veränderten

NIS2-Richtlinie im Gesundheitswesen: Praxisleitfaden für die Geschäftsführung

Datenschutzkonformer KI-Einsatz in Bundesbehörden: Neue Handreichung gibt Orientierung
Hamsterrad-Rebell

Cyberversicherung ohne Datenbasis? Warum CIOs und CISOs jetzt auf quantifizierbare Risikomodelle setzen müssen

Identity Security Posture Management (ISPM): Rettung oder Hype?

Platform Security: Warum ERP-Systeme besondere Sicherheitsmaßnahmen erfordern

Daten in eigener Hand: Europas Souveränität im Fokus






