
A remote code execution vulnerability is being dubbed ‘PrintNightmare’ (CVE-2021-34527 and CVE-2021-1675). + The vulnerabilities are present in the Windows Spooler Service present on all Windows versions. + Microsoft has released two patches to address these vulnerabilities (an Out-of_Band update on July 1 as well as the July 13th monthly update). + Exploit code is readily available and has already been folded into popular hacking tools like Mimikatz and the Metasploit framework. + SentinelOne has provided DeepVisibility queries to detect attempts to exploit PrintNightmare in customer environments.
What Happened?
On June 29, 2021, details emerged of a remotely exploitable vulnerability in the Microsoft Windows Print Spooler service affecting all versions of Windows to date. The vulnerability was originally discovered by security researchers at Sangfor Technologies and responsibly disclosed to Microsoft. Variants of the vulnerability, appropriately dubbed ‘PrintNightmare’, are tracked under CVE-2021-34527 and CVE-2021-1675. They allow Remote Code Execution and have now been folded into popular attack tools like Mimikatz and Metasploit. Microsoft has released updated versions of their patches and guidance as of July 13th. That said, if Microsoft’s instructions are not carefully followed, hosts may still be left exposed to exploitation.
The PrintNightmare Rapidly Escalates
Initially, it was believed that the vulnerability could only be exploited on Windows Servers; however, researchers found an alternative call flow to the vulnerable function that allows attacking any Windows machine running the Print Spooler service. Much of the severity lies in the ease of exploitation: it is network exploitable, requires no user interaction, and can be initiated from a lower-privileged context. All of that is a recipe for quick adoption by attackers of all stripes.
In this flaw, the Windows Print Spooler service improperly governs access to RpcAddPrinterDriverEx(), resulting in the ability to achieve SYSTEM privileges, and subsequently execute code within that context. The vulnerability was first exploited using the RpcAddPrinterDriverEx API. Subsequently, newer versions of the exploit began using an alternative execution flow calling the function RpcAsyncAddPrinterDriver to bypass detections. Ultimately, the flaw allows for the loading of a malicious DLL of the attacker’s choice, making the vulnerability ideal for multiple stages in the attack chain.
The vulnerability affects all supported versions of Microsoft Windows (servers and workstations alike). Hosts with the Windows Print Spooler Service running are exposed to potential exploitation.
Several days after Microsoft Emergency patch (KB5005010) was published, researchers published a full bypass which still allows full remote exploitation of a fully patched and rebooted system. The PrintNightmare attack was quickly integrated into mainstream attack tools such as MetaSploit, Mimikatz, and WinPwn.
Fachartikel

Wenn Angreifer selbst zum Ziel werden: Wie Forscher eine Infostealer-Infrastruktur kompromittierten

Mehr Gesetze, mehr Druck: Was bei NIS2, CRA, DORA & Co. am Ende zählt

WinDbg-UI blockiert beim Kopieren: Ursachenforschung führt zu Zwischenablage-Deadlock in virtuellen Umgebungen

RISE with SAP: Wie Sicherheitsmaßnahmen den Return on Investment sichern

Jailbreaking: Die unterschätzte Sicherheitslücke moderner KI-Systeme
Studien

Deutsche Unicorn-Gründer bevorzugen zunehmend den Standort Deutschland

IT-Modernisierung entscheidet über KI-Erfolg und Cybersicherheit

Neue ISACA-Studie: Datenschutzbudgets werden trotz steigender Risiken voraussichtlich schrumpfen

Cybersecurity-Jahresrückblick: Wie KI-Agenten und OAuth-Lücken die Bedrohungslandschaft 2025 veränderten
![Featured image for “Phishing-Studie deckt auf: [EXTERN]-Markierung schützt Klinikpersonal kaum”](https://www.all-about-security.de/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/phishing-4.jpg)
Phishing-Studie deckt auf: [EXTERN]-Markierung schützt Klinikpersonal kaum
Whitepaper

ETSI veröffentlicht weltweit führenden Standard für die Sicherung von KI

Allianz Risk Barometer 2026: Cyberrisiken führen das Ranking an, KI rückt auf Platz zwei vor

Cybersecurity-Jahresrückblick: Wie KI-Agenten und OAuth-Lücken die Bedrohungslandschaft 2025 veränderten

NIS2-Richtlinie im Gesundheitswesen: Praxisleitfaden für die Geschäftsführung

Datenschutzkonformer KI-Einsatz in Bundesbehörden: Neue Handreichung gibt Orientierung
Hamsterrad-Rebell

Cyberversicherung ohne Datenbasis? Warum CIOs und CISOs jetzt auf quantifizierbare Risikomodelle setzen müssen

Identity Security Posture Management (ISPM): Rettung oder Hype?

Platform Security: Warum ERP-Systeme besondere Sicherheitsmaßnahmen erfordern

Daten in eigener Hand: Europas Souveränität im Fokus






