
52% of Organisations Say Risk Factors are a Critical Consideration When Evaluating AI Use Cases
A new Gartner, Inc. survey revealed that 55% of organisations that have previously deployed AI always consider AI for every new use case that they are evaluating. More than half of organisations (52%) report that risk factors are a critical consideration when evaluating new AI use cases.
“An AI-first strategy is a hallmark of AI maturity and a driver of increased return on investment,” said Erick Brethenoux, Distinguished VP Analyst at Gartner. “However, AI-first does not mean AI-only. While AI-mature organisations are more likely to consider AI for every possible use case, they are also more likely to weigh risk as a critical factor when determining whether to move forward.”
The survey was conducted in October through December 2022 among 622 respondents from organisations in the US, France, the UK and Germany that have deployed AI. Gartner defines an “AI-mature” organisation as those who have deployed more than five AI use cases across several business units and processes, in production for more than three years.
Across all organisations, respondents had deployed an average of 41 AI use cases, with use cases remaining in production for 3.5 years (see Fig.1)
Fig. 1: Average Duration of AI Use Cases in Production
Source: Gartner (July 2023)
Both the number of use cases and the time in production rose with the size of the organisation, with global organisations reporting an average of 51 use cases in production for 4.3 years.
AI-Mature Organisations Involve Legal Counsel at Ideation
The most significant differentiator identified among AI-mature organisations was the involvement of legal counsel at the ideation stage of AI use cases. AI-mature organisations were 3.8 times more likely to involve legal experts at the ideation phase of an AI project’s life cycle.
“There is uncertainty around the ethics and legality of various AI tactics, as well as a fear of violating privacy regulations,” said Brethenoux. “Organisations that are more experienced with AI do not want to be told they’ve crossed a line once they are further along in the process of developing an AI use case.”
AI-Mature Organisations Evaluate Technical and Business ROI Metrics
When evaluating the return on AI investment, 52% of AI-mature organisations focus on a combination of technical and business metrics to assess ROI. In less mature organisations, technical metrics are most often used to measure the value of AI use cases.
More AI-mature organisations – 41% compared with 24% of all others – use customer success-related business metrics to estimate ROI. Furthermore, 47% of AI-mature organisations cite customer service as one of the top three business functions benefiting from AI, compared with 34% of others.
“Many business and IT leaders focus on AI’s impact on optimisation and productivity, but organisations do not prosper through cost cutting,” said Brethenoux. “Organisations that are using AI technology to attract and retain customers are able to more clearly articulate the impact on the business, driving a virtuous cycle of executive buy-in for new AI projects.”
AI-mature organisations are also more likely to define metrics earlier in the AI lifecycle. Sixty-seven per cent of AI-mature organisations define metrics at the ideation phase of every use case, compared with 44% of less mature organisations.
Gartner clients can learn more in “Survey Analysis: An AI-First Strategy Leads to Increasing Returns.”
Fachartikel

Wenn Angreifer selbst zum Ziel werden: Wie Forscher eine Infostealer-Infrastruktur kompromittierten

Mehr Gesetze, mehr Druck: Was bei NIS2, CRA, DORA & Co. am Ende zählt

WinDbg-UI blockiert beim Kopieren: Ursachenforschung führt zu Zwischenablage-Deadlock in virtuellen Umgebungen

RISE with SAP: Wie Sicherheitsmaßnahmen den Return on Investment sichern

Jailbreaking: Die unterschätzte Sicherheitslücke moderner KI-Systeme
Studien

Deutsche Unicorn-Gründer bevorzugen zunehmend den Standort Deutschland

IT-Modernisierung entscheidet über KI-Erfolg und Cybersicherheit

Neue ISACA-Studie: Datenschutzbudgets werden trotz steigender Risiken voraussichtlich schrumpfen

Cybersecurity-Jahresrückblick: Wie KI-Agenten und OAuth-Lücken die Bedrohungslandschaft 2025 veränderten
![Featured image for “Phishing-Studie deckt auf: [EXTERN]-Markierung schützt Klinikpersonal kaum”](https://www.all-about-security.de/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/phishing-4.jpg)
Phishing-Studie deckt auf: [EXTERN]-Markierung schützt Klinikpersonal kaum
Whitepaper

ETSI veröffentlicht weltweit führenden Standard für die Sicherung von KI

Allianz Risk Barometer 2026: Cyberrisiken führen das Ranking an, KI rückt auf Platz zwei vor

Cybersecurity-Jahresrückblick: Wie KI-Agenten und OAuth-Lücken die Bedrohungslandschaft 2025 veränderten

NIS2-Richtlinie im Gesundheitswesen: Praxisleitfaden für die Geschäftsführung

Datenschutzkonformer KI-Einsatz in Bundesbehörden: Neue Handreichung gibt Orientierung
Hamsterrad-Rebell

Cyberversicherung ohne Datenbasis? Warum CIOs und CISOs jetzt auf quantifizierbare Risikomodelle setzen müssen

Identity Security Posture Management (ISPM): Rettung oder Hype?

Platform Security: Warum ERP-Systeme besondere Sicherheitsmaßnahmen erfordern

Daten in eigener Hand: Europas Souveränität im Fokus







