
Making Sure Your XDR Platform Outlasts Your Adversaries + The very essence of an XDR platform is facilitating detection and response to persistent threats by collecting and analyzing data from different sources, with endpoints being the most dominant points of origin.
Collecting all the correct data, however, is only one part of the equation. Just as important is: how long will your data be available? Put another way, how important is it to be able to go back in time? And, indeed, how far back can you go?
While having a rich data supply is obviously a necessary condition for any effective XDR platform, the platform is only as good as the longevity of its data. Threat actors are patient adversaries, and your XDR platform needs to be able to out-wait your attackers. So, when it comes to data retention, just how long is long enough?
The Need for Data Retention
Here’s a typical statement from a Security Researcher about an incident he handled:
“I was working for a large multinational corporation at the time when we found we had Winnti in our network for over a year. We only found it because of a report that was released by a security vendor at the time, with IOCs.We only kept logs for three months, and we had no idea when the attack began. Finally, we found VPN login/location logs that were retained long enough that showed us a user was in the Middle East and logged out at the end of his workweek and that same night logged into the network from Africa.
After this incident, we purchased a SIEM and began planning for data retention. As often happens with SIEM projects, I left before that project was complete, and I’m not sure that even today they have more than a year worth of retention, as that company has 100Ks of end-point, which means A LOT of data.”
This is just one case, but it does hint that security teams often discover how much data retention they need only when they come face-to-face with threats that linger in their environments for long periods. For many of them, it’s a case of hindsight being 20/20.
Also, even large and resourceful corporations often choose not to invest in making sure they have the data they need for as long as they will need it.
The anonymous story above may remind readers of a recent chain of events around one of the most concerning campaigns of recent years: SUNBURST. After the attack was found, the related DNS calls published by CloudFlare showed that infections began as early as April 2020 and took eight months to discover.
More here.
Fachartikel

Warum ist Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) entscheidend?

CVE-2024-47176 – Linux-Privilegienerweiterung über CUPS-Schwachstelle

Was die PCLOB-Entlassungen für das EU-US-Datenschutzabkommen bedeuten

Sicher und besser fahren: Was NIS2 für Internetknoten und ihre Kunden bedeutet

2,3 Millionen Organisationen setzen auf DMARC-Compliance
Studien

Gartner-Umfrage: Nur 14% der Sicherheitsverantwortlichen können Datensicherheit und Geschäftsziele erfolgreich vereinen

Zunehmende Angriffskomplexität

Aufruf zum Handeln: Dringender Plan für den Übergang zur Post-Quanten-Kryptographie erforderlich

IBM-Studie: Gen-KI wird die finanzielle Leistung von Banken im Jahr 2025 steigern

Smartphones – neue Studie zeigt: Phishing auch hier Sicherheitsrisiko Nr. 1
Whitepaper

eBook: Cybersicherheit für SAP

Global Threat Report 2025: Chinesische Cyberspionage-Aktivitäten nehmen um 150 % zu, wobei die Taktiken immer aggressiver werden und zunehmend KI zur Täuschung eingesetzt wird

Die 5 Stufen von CTEM – Ihr Leitfaden zur Umsetzung

BSI veröffentlicht IT-Grundschutz-Profil für kleine und mittlere Flughäfen
